Davis v. Bissen
Held that unabandoned possessions of houseless persons constitute property and were protected by Hawaii’s due process clause. The county therefore violated procedural due process rights of houseless individuals by not providing adequate notice and pre-deprivation contested case hearing for possessions seized and destroyed during encampment sweep.
Related Commentary
States Can Protect Unhoused People When the U.S. Supreme Court Won’t
The U.S. high court’s ruling allowing anti-camping laws underscores the importance and potential of state constitutional protections.
Hawaii Expands Due Process Rights of Unhoused People
The Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that the state constitution requires the government to hold a hearing before seizing and destroying the belongings of people living on public land.