Rhode Island
Rhode Island’s highest court is the Supreme Court of Rhode Island. The court has four justices and one chief justice. The chief justice is selected according to the same procedures as their peers on the court. (Source: Rhode Island Constitution)
Judicial Selection
The governor selects Supreme Court of Rhode Island justices from a list provided by a judicial nominating commission. The governor’s nominee must be confirmed by a majority of the state house and senate. An appointed justice serves a single life term with no mandatory retirement age. When a seat on the Rhode Island Supreme Court becomes open in the middle of a justice’s term, the governor selects a candidate from a list provided by a judicial nominating commission. The nominee must be confirmed by a majority of the state house and senate. An appointed justice serves a single life term with no mandatory retirement age.
State Constitution
Rhode Island has had two state constitutions adopted in 1842 and 1986. As of January 1, 2024, it had 13 amendments. (Source: John Dinan, 2024)
Filters
States Grapple with Problematic Rule from Federal Voting Cases
The Purcell principle, which holds that federal courts should not change voting rules too close to an election, is increasingly being raised in state litigation.
Advice for Law Students From State Supreme Court Justices
As the school year kicks off, eight justices reflect on what they wish someone had told them when they were in law school.
State Constitutional Conventions, Explained
The last state to hold a conventional convention was in Rhode Island in 1986.
The Right to Petition in State Constitutions, Explained
Some states protect citizens’ right to make requests of or complaints against the government more broadly than the federal Constitution.
What the SCOTUS Term Means for State Courts
Some of the Court’s most important holdings — including on abortion, gun restrictions, and presidential immunity — have implications for state courts and constitutions.
Montana’s Climate Change Lawsuit May See Sequels Across America
Courts in Montana, Hawaii, and New Mexico have been receptive to claims by youth plaintiffs that failures to protect the environment violate state constitutions.
Judicial Deference to Agency Expertise in the States
Almost all state courts recognize the importance of agencies’ expertise in policymaking.
SCOTUS’s 2nd Amendment Decision Leaves Open Questions for State Courts
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the disarmament of a domestic abuser in United States v. Rahimi, but litigation over where to draw the line will continue.