Graham v. Adams
Rejected partisan gerrymandering claims as to congressional and state house districts. The Court held that the partisanship in the drafting of the current maps “does not rise to the level of a clear, flagrant, or unwarranted deviation from constitutional limitations or a threat to our democratic form of government.”
Related Commentary
Status of Partisan Gerrymandering Litigation in State Courts
Kentucky Supreme Court Weighs Partisan Gerrymandering
Voters are increasingly turning to state constitutions to fight partisan gerrymandering. Will the Kentucky Supreme Court be the next to greenlight such claims?