Main Menu Close Menu

People v. McDaniel

Docket number
S171393
Date

Ruled that the state constitution does not require unanimity in jury’s determination of disputed aggravating circumstances.

Opinions, Briefs and other Documents

  • Opinion

People v. McDaniel, Cal. S171393

  • Party Brief

McDaniel -Answer to Amicus Briefs -12.23.2020

  • Amicus Brief

Criminal Justice Legal Foundation -Amicus Brief -11.23.2020

  • Amicus Brief

District Attys Assoc -Brief in Support of State -11.23.2020

  • Amicus Brief

Six Current and Former DAs -Amicus Brief -10.28.2020

  • Amicus Brief

Hoeffel Little Atiq and Whitman -Amicus Brief -10.28.2020

  • Amicus Brief

Figueroa and Lopez -Brief in Support of McDaniel -10.28.2020

  • Amicus Brief

Gov Newsom -Brief in Support of McDaniel -10.26.2020

  • Amicus Brief

ACLU et al -Brief in Support of McDaniel -10.22.2020

  • Amicus Brief

California Constitution Law Scholars -Brief in Support of McDaniel -10.15.2020

  • Party Brief

McDaniel -Third Supplemental Reply Brief -09.11.2020

  • Amicus Brief

Cal Public Defenders Assn et al -Brief in Support of McDaniel -09.10.2020

  • Party Brief

State of California -Third Supplemental Brief -08.14.2020

  • Party Brief

McDaniel -Second Supplemental Reply Brief -12.07.2017

  • Party Brief

State of California -Second Supplemental Brief -11.07.2017

  • Party Brief

McDaniel -Second Supplemental Opening Brief -10.18.2017

  • Party Brief

State of California -Supplemental Brief -06.12.2017

  • Party Brief

McDaniel -Supplemental Opening Brief -05.18.2017

  • Party Brief

McDaniel -Reply Brief -05.10.2017

  • Party Brief

State of California -Brief -03.10.2016

  • Party Brief

McDaniel -Opening Brief -08.06.2015

Sole footer logo

A project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law

© 2024 Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law

Privacy Policy Accessibility