State v. Hoffman

Docket number
SCWC-23-0000185
Date

Held that a defendant’s un-Mirandized statements made in response to a police officer’s words “normally attendant to arrest and custody” were not admissible if the officer’s statements “were reasonably likely to lead to an incriminating response,” thus constituting an “interrogation” under art. 1 sec. 10 of the Hawaii Constitution

Opinions, Briefs and other Documents

  • Opinion

Supreme Court of Hawai'i - Opinion

Sole footer logo

A project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law