Wasserman v. Franklin County
Held that a plaintiff who asserts only the rights of a third-party lacks standing to sue in Georgia courts, overruling precedent that had imported the federal third-party standing doctrine.
Held that a plaintiff who asserts only the rights of a third-party lacks standing to sue in Georgia courts, overruling precedent that had imported the federal third-party standing doctrine.
© 2025 Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law
Related Commentary
New State Hurdles to Standing Threaten Abortion Ban Challenges
Georgia’s Supreme Court sent a challenge to the state’s abortion ban back to the trial court to consider if the plaintiffs, including medical providers, had standing to bring the suit.