Search
Filter Search
State v. Scott
The Supreme Court of Nebraska held that state and federal search and seizure protections did not apply to the defendant's arrest because Belizean police acted independently and were not in a "joint venture" with U.S. law enforcement
Florida High Court to Hear Arguments in Politicized “Voter Fraud” Case
The case challenges Gov. Ron DeSantis’s prosecutions of people with felony convictions who thought they were eligible to vote.
The Promenade D'Iberville, LLC v. Jacksonville Electric Authority
The Mississippi Supreme Court held the Mississippi Constitution does not bar courts from adjudicating claims against out-of-state entities, despite assertions of sovereign immunity and alleged violations of the Full Faith and Credit Clause and other comity principles
State v. Small
The Supreme Court of Appeals for West Virginia held the defendant's state and federal due process rights were not violated
University of Utah v. Tullis
The Utah Supreme Court held that its prior plurality decision holding that recovery limits statutes were unconstitutional as applied to the University of Utah did not have precedential value in the present medical malpractice suit
State v. Perea
The New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that first-hand observations by a confidential informant can satisfy the requirement of probable cause for a search warrant under the state’s Rules of Criminal Procedure and search and seizure provision, if it is supported by sufficient detail to indicate the informant’s basis of knowledge
Land v. BAS, LLC
The Arkansas Supreme Court held that the Commissioner of State Lands mailing a notice of tax sale via certified mail to the property owner’s last known addressed satisfied due process, and a tax sale of property where sufficient notice was provided did not constitute a taking under the state and federal constitutions, precluding the owner from overcoming sovereign immunity based on these claims
Bojorquez v. State
The Florida Supreme Court held that repealed taxicab licenses that are no longer recognized by the State and County due to the dissolution of the issuing Commission did not amount to compensable property under the state’s Takings Clause
City of Dover v. Secretary of State
The New Hampshire Supreme Court held that a redistricting statute is presumed constitutional and will not be invalidated unless there is a clear and substantial conflict with the constitution
Bolen v. New Mexico Racing Commission
The Supreme Court of New Mexico held that judicial immunity is an affirmative defense available to public bodies sued under New Mexico's Civil Rights Act and may extend to bodies performing quasi-judicial functions in the executive branch
