McGill v. Thurston

Held that proposed constitutional amendment relating to county casino licenses was not unconstitutionally misleading as it appeared on the ballot. The ballot title sufficiently informed voters that if a county casino license had been issued, it would be revoked by proposed constitutional amendment; its popular name, when read together with ballot title, contemplated the revocation of existing licenses; and read as a whole, its popular name made clear that the proposed amendment would require local voter approval for certain new casino licenses to be issued.