Rejected federal “open fields” exception to the federal Fourth Amendment in interpreting Article I, Section 7, of the Tennessee Constitution
State courts have long provided more search and seizure protections than the U.S. Supreme Court — and they sometimes influence federal law.
An appellate court in Tennessee became the latest to reject a significant exception to the federal protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
A project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law
© 2024 Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law
Related Commentary
Fourth Amendment Lags Behind State Search and Seizure Provisions
State courts have long provided more search and seizure protections than the U.S. Supreme Court — and they sometimes influence federal law.
States May Close the ‘Open Fields’ Exception to the Fourth Amendment
An appellate court in Tennessee became the latest to reject a significant exception to the federal protection against unreasonable search and seizure.