In Re Application for Correction of Birth Record of Hailey Emmeline Adelaide
Court was unable to form a majority on the merits, which had the effect of leaving undisturbed lower court rulings denying a transgender woman’s request to change the sex marker on her birth certificate. The justices divided 4–3 in favor of finding that the court had jurisdiction to decide the appeal, despite a lack of an opposing party. But the four in favor of reaching the merits (Jennifer Brunner, Patrick F. Fischer, Michael P. Donnelly, Melody J. Stewart) could not reach a consensus on the outcome. Fischer, Donnelly, and Stewart agreed with the lower courts that the state law governing birth certificate corrections only allows changes when the sex identified at birth was recorded inaccurately. Brunner rejected that statutory interpretation.
Related Commentary
Are State Courts More Protective of Transgender People than Federal Courts?
As the U.S. Supreme Court deals another blow to trans rights, a new survey finds that almost 55 percent of related state cases from 2022 to 2024 had a positive impact on trans lives.
Ohio Supreme Court Hears Argument on Birth Certificate Changes for Transgender Ohioans
Justices raised questions about the court’s jurisdiction.