Texas Propane Gas Association v. City of Houston

Docket number

Concurrence and Dissent would have held that plaintiff lacks constitutional standing to challenge Houston’s liquefied petroleum gas ordinances as preempted by state law, opining that plaintiff must plead facts showing a concrete injury arising from every provision of statutory or regulatory scheme she wants enjoined, even if all the provisions are assailed on the same legal ground

Sole footer logo

A project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law