Happel v. Guilford County Board of Education
Minor student and student’s mother brought an action against the county board of education and the operator of a clinic after the student was given a COVID-19 vaccine without consent from either student or parent at a school testing and vaccination site operated by the clinic, asserting claims for battery and for violations of mother’s constitutional liberty and parental rights and of student’s bodily autonomy rights under State Constitution. The North Carolina Supreme Court held that the law of the land clause of the state constitution protects both a parent’s right to control her child’s upbringing and the right to bodily integrity. Also held that the immunity provision of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act only covers tort injuries and did not preempt claimants’ state constitutional claims. In a dissent, Justice Allison Riggs criticized the majority for “explicitly rewrit[ing] an unambiguous statute to exclude state constitutional claims from the broad and inclusive immunity ‘from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss’ established by the [] PREP Act.” Further, Riggs critiqued the majority for “arbitrarily defin[ing] without any apparent principle” the state constitutional right to bodily integrity “divorced from bodily autonomy,” and “appl[ying] arbitrarily” the right of parents to direct the raising of their children.
On remand, an intermediate court found the plaintiffs had sufficiently alleged other aspects of their state constitutional claims to withstand dismissal and remanded to the trial court to proceed with evaluating the claims on the merits.
Related Commentary
Case Trends: State Courts Continue to Grapple with Covid-19 Policies
Courts are still weighing the constitutionality of state responses to the pandemic more than five years after its start.
Vaccines, Religious Freedom, and Parental Rights
Massachusetts’s supreme court ruled last week that the state violated religious freedom guarantees when it vaccinated a child in its custody over parental objections.