Raftery v. State Board of Retirement

Docket number
SJC-13646
Date

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that forfeiture of pension benefits required by state law when a state employee is convicted of violating laws applicable to his office did not violate the excessive fines or “cruel or unusual” punishment clause. Also held that U.S. Supreme Court’s multifactor disproportionality analysis under the 8th Amendment excessive fines provision should be adopted for purposes of the state excessive fines clause.

Opinions, Briefs and other Documents

  • Amicus Brief

Springfield No One Leaves - Amicus Brief

  • Party Brief

Raftery - Reply Brief

  • Amicus Brief

Estate of Caroline Walsh - Amicus Brief

  • Party Brief

Raftery - Corrected Brief

  • Party Brief

State Board of Retirement - Brief

Sole footer logo

A project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law