Held that partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable and gave guidance to lower courts resolving such a claim
Though the right was short-lived, it’s an example of how states can expand — and contract — voting rights.
The tests state courts use to decide whether a law impermissibly infringes on people’s rights play a big role in determining whether government restrictions on those rights are upheld.
Utah’s high court sent a closely watched challenge to the state’s congressional maps back to the lower court.
Over a dozen academics, practitioners, and thought leaders weigh in on the most notable state constitutional cases of the year.
A project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law
© 2025 Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law
Related Commentary
New Jersey’s Constitution Allowed Women to Vote in the 1700s
Though the right was short-lived, it’s an example of how states can expand — and contract — voting rights.
Levels of Scrutiny Applied by State Courts, Explained
The tests state courts use to decide whether a law impermissibly infringes on people’s rights play a big role in determining whether government restrictions on those rights are upheld.
Status of Partisan Gerrymandering Litigation in State Courts
Utah’s high court sent a closely watched challenge to the state’s congressional maps back to the lower court.
2023’s Most Significant State Constitutional Cases
Over a dozen academics, practitioners, and thought leaders weigh in on the most notable state constitutional cases of the year.