Held that partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable and gave guidance to lower courts resolving such a claim
The tests state courts use to decide whether a law impermissibly infringes on people’s rights play a big role in determining whether government restrictions on those rights are upheld.
Utah’s high court sent a closely watched challenge to the state’s congressional maps back to the lower court.
Over a dozen academics, practitioners, and thought leaders weigh in on the most notable state constitutional cases of the year.
All but one state constitution affirmatively establishes a right to vote.
A project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law
© 2025 Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law
Related Commentary
Levels of Scrutiny Applied by State Courts, Explained
The tests state courts use to decide whether a law impermissibly infringes on people’s rights play a big role in determining whether government restrictions on those rights are upheld.
Status of Partisan Gerrymandering Litigation in State Courts
Utah’s high court sent a closely watched challenge to the state’s congressional maps back to the lower court.
2023’s Most Significant State Constitutional Cases
Over a dozen academics, practitioners, and thought leaders weigh in on the most notable state constitutional cases of the year.
Voting Rights Under State Constitutions, Explained
All but one state constitution affirmatively establishes a right to vote.