Search
Filter Search
Northwest Landowners Association v. State
The North Dakota Supreme Court held, in part, that pre-condemnation survey provisions that authorize survey access to landowners' properties is not facially invalid under state takings laws because there is no protected interested in excluding limited, innocuous intrusion by pre-condemnation surveyors
Ward v. State
The Indiana Supreme Court held that post-conviction relief under the state's constitution does not apply to the method in which that sentence is carried out and is instead limited to the conviction or sentence
Maine State Chamber of Commerce v. Department of Labor
The Maine Supreme Court held that the Department of Labor rule requiring employers to pay nonrefundable premiums into the Paid Family and Medical Leave fund did not constitute a regulatory taking under the Maine and U.S. Constitutions
State v. Engroff
The Maine Supreme Court held that the admission a video-recorded forensic interview of a child victim does not violate a defendant’s confrontation rights under the Maine Constitution
State v. Jacques
The Connecticut Supreme Court held that its state constitution does not entitle a criminal defendant to a second probable cause hearing after a conviction is reversed unless there is a jurisdictional defect in the original hearing
North Carolina Department of Revenue v. Philip Morris U.S., Inc.
The North Carolina Supreme Court held that the state's Office of Administrative Hearings does not have jurisdiction to hear as-applied constitutional challenges to tax statutes, and allowing it to decide such challenges would violate the Separation of Powers Clause
Morris v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration
The New Hamphire Supreme Court held that double taxation by two states does not violate the the Commerce Clause or the state's constitution because it did not inherently discriminate against interstate commerce
Long v. Commonwealth
The Kentucky Supreme Court held that the Kentucky Constitution does not bar claims for purely declaratory relief or claims for refends of funds never due to the state
State v. A.M.W.
The Washington Supreme Court reinforced the Washington Constitution's protection of judicial autonomy in procedural matters when it clarifiied that the procedural rules it adopts, such as JuCR 7.16, control over conflicting statutes but conflicting statutes control on substantive matters
Krug v. New Jersey State Parole Board
The New Jersey Supreme Court held that the retroactive application of a 1997 amendment to the Parole Act did not violate the ex post facto clauses of the state and U.S. constitutions
